In the first study to evaluate YouTube videos on facial plastic surgery procedures, which draw millions of viewers, Rutgers University researchers found that most are misleading marketing campaigns posted by non-qualified medical professionals.
The millions of people who turn to YouTube as a source for education on facial plastic surgery receive a false understanding that does not include the risks or alternative options, said lead author Boris Paskhover, an assistant professor at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School’s department of otolaryngology who specialises in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. “Videos on facial plastic surgery may be mainly marketing campaigns and may not fully be intended as educational,” Paskhover said.
Paskhover and a team of students at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School evaluated 240 top-viewed videos with 160m combined views that resulted from keyword searches for “blepharoplasty,” “eyelid surgery,” “dermal fillers,” “facial fillers,” “otoplasty,” “ear surgery,” “rhytidectomy,” “facelift,” “lip augmentation,” “lip fillers,” “rhinoplasty” and/or “nose job.”
The researchers evaluated the videos using DISCERN criteria, a scale for assessing the quality of medical information presented online or in other media, which takes into account risks, a discussion of non-surgical options and the validity of the information presented. The researchers also evaluated the people who posted the videos, including whether they were health care professionals, patients or third parties. Physicians were rated by their board status on the American Board of Medical Specialties database.
The results revealed that the majority of videos did not include professionals qualified in the procedures portrayed, including 94 videos with no medical professional at all. Seventy-two videos, featuring board-certified physicians, had relatively high DISCERN scores and provided some valuable patient information. “However, even videos posted by legitimate board-certified surgeons may be marketing tools made to look like educational videos,” said Paskhover.
“Patients and physicians who use YouTube for educational purposes should be aware that these videos can present biased information, be unbalanced when evaluating risks versus benefits and be unclear about the qualifications of the practitioner,” said Paskhover. “YouTube is for marketing. The majority of the people who post these videos are trying to sell you something.”
“As is common with many procedures in medicine, sometimes it is easiest to see a video of how the procedure is carried out rather than reading a pamphlet or a consent form,” said Dr Arpan Prabhu of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Centre in Pennsylvania. “There’s a significant need for quality videos to be created and uploaded,” Prabhu is quoted in Reuters Health as saying. “We hope to be part of the solution in the future.”
In the facial plastic surgery study, researchers saw a difference between the scores of videos with medical professionals versus those without. Overall, however, most videos didn’t include information verified by medical professionals.
“Online health-related information is for the most part unregulated, and consumers should bear this in mind and think about the source of the material they are viewing or reading,” said Dr Trevor Kwok of the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.
Kwok, who wasn’t involved with this study, has evaluated YouTube videos about varicose vein treatments. “This is no longer an ‘emerging’ issue as the web and social media are already so ingrained in daily life,” Kwok said. “But our understanding of exactly how this affects healthcare consumers is lagging.”
Research letter summary
YouTube is a major modality for patient education. During the last decade, videos documenting facial plastic surgery procedures, patient experiences, and medical commentary have garnered hundreds of millions of views. The growing prevalence of YouTube as a primary source of medical information has prompted investigators to evaluate video quality and creator qualification.1,2 To date, the quality of facial plastic surgery content on YouTube has not been evaluated.
Brittany Ward, Max Ward, Alexis Nicheporuck, Issa Alaeddin, Boris Paskover
[link url="https://news.rutgers.edu/research-news/youtube-source-misinformation-plastic-surgery-rutgers-study-finds/20180815#.W4K0e-gzbIV"]Rutgers New Jersey Medical School material[/link]
[link url="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-plastic-surgery/plastic-surgery-videos-on-youtube-arent-always-accurate-idUSKCN1L926I"]Reuters Health material[/link]
[link url="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamafacialplasticsurgery/article-abstract/2697023"]JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery research letter abstract[/link]